|
NASA
Terminates Funding for X-33 / X-34 Programs
|
More
Information: |
|

|
NASA has
announced it will not use Space Launch Initiative (SLI) funds for
the X-33 or X-34 programs. As a result, the current X-33 program
will end when the cooperative agreement between NASA and Lockheed
Martin expires on March 31, unless Lockheed Martin chooses to go
forward with the program with its own funds. NASA is also in the
process of ending its X-34 contract with Orbital Sciences Corp.
Continuation of both programs had depended upon their successfully
competing for Space Launch Initiative funding, but NASA determined
that the benefits to be derived from flight testing the X-33 or
X-34 X-vehicles did not warrant the magnitude of government
investment required and that SLI funds should be applied to higher
priority needs.
Rep. Dana
Rohrabacher (R-California), chairman of the House Science Space
and Aeronautics Subcommittee, applauded NASA's decision to
terminate the X-33 and X-34 programs. Arthur Stephenson, Director
of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama,
said, “What we're hearing from industry and our own evaluation
is that we believe a single-stage-to-orbit vehicle for a second
generation vehicle [a follow-on to the space shuttle] is not
viable at this time. We are focusing on multi-stage, beginning
with a two-stage vehicle.”
NASA investment
in the X-33 program totaled US$912 million, staying within its
1996 budget projection for the program. Lockheed Martin originally
committed to invest US$212 million in the X-33, but during the
life of the program increased that amount to US$357 million. NASA
has invested US$205 million on the X-34 program.
NASA began the
X-33 program, working with Lockheed Martin, in 1996 as part of its
Reusable Launch Vehicle program. It called for the demonstration
of a subscale single-stage-to-orbit vehicle, one that would go
from launch pad to orbit without using multiple stages. In
November 1999 the X-33's composite liquid hydrogen fuel tank
failed during testing. An investigation into the cause of the
failure revealed that composite technology was not mature enough
for such a use. Lockheed Martin proposed to complete development
of the X-33 by replacing its two composite liquid hydrogen tanks
with aluminum tanks. NASA agreed to permit them to compete for SLI
funding to do so, but with this termination announcement,
determined the benefits of testing the X-33 in flight did not
justify the cost.
The
X-34 program also was initiated in 1996, to provide a low-cost
technology test bed that would demonstrate a streamlined
management approach with a rapid development schedule and l imited
testing. A joint NASA/Orbital Sciences Corporation review of the
project last year revealed the need to redefine the project's
approach, scope, budget and schedule. To ensure safety and mission
success of the X-34 it became necessary to increase government
technical insight, hardware testing and integrated systems
assessments. As a result, the projected cost of completing the
X-34 program at an acceptable level of risk rose significantly
above the planned budget. NASA decided that such additional
funding for X-34 risk reduction would have to be competed within
the SLI evaluation process. NASA determined that the benefits to
be derived from continuing the X-34 program does not justify the
cost.
Copyright 2001 - Andrews Space & Technology Andrews Space & Technology Privacy
Statement and Copyright Information
SPACEandTECH Digest is a weekly roundup of the latest industry news of interest
to the space professional. SPACEandTECH Flash! is an internet push
service offered by Andrews Space & Technology to bring the
latest on orders, launches, and important breaking news to your
desktop. SPACEandTECH Digest and SPACEandTECH Flash! are part of
the Andrews Space & Technology www.spaceandtech.com
website, a website designed to serve the information needs of the
space industry.
If you would like to subscribe to the SPACEandTECH
Flash!
(currently a free service), contact the www.spaceandtech.com
Editor-in-Chief, Joe Hopkins, at editor@spaceandtech.com
|